Pass-examination of Amber Heard concludes in Johnny Depp defamation trial

Posted on 18 views
Placeholder whilst article movements load

Pass-examination of Amber Heard via certainly one of Johnny Depp’s lawyers concluded Tuesday afternoon in Fairfax County within the sour defamation trial between the movie celebrities. Depp lawyer Camille Vasquez’s rapid-fire questions sought to discredit Heard’s testimony and regularly classified her as abusive towards her ex-husband all the way through their tumultuous dating and marriage.

Depp sued Heard for $50 million over a 2018 op-ed she revealed in The Washington Put up, which alleged home abuse from an unnamed individual. He claims the piece has ruined his popularity and his profession and contends that he by no means bodily or sexually abused Heard. She countersued him for $100 million after his attorneys mentioned her allegations had been false. (The Put up isn’t a defendant within the lawsuit.)

Legal professionals for Johnny Depp attempted to discredit his ex-wife Amber Heard’s claims of abuse on Might 17 via appearing the jury a knife she purchased for the actor. (Video: Reuters)

Vasquez introduced the jury with a knife Heard gave Depp for his birthday engraved with the word “until loss of life” in Spanish. “That is the knife you gave to the person who would get inebriated and violent with you,” Vasquez mentioned.

“I wasn’t apprehensive he was once going to stab me with it,” Heard mentioned.

As she would during her cross-examination questions Tuesday, Vasquez then briefly pivoted, citing every other, unrelated incident. She wondered Heard’s testimony relating to a in particular brutal incident she alleged came about in Australia, by which she claims she was once sexually assaulted with a liquor bottle and the end of Depp’s finger was once severed. Depp alleges Heard reduce his finger via throwing a vodka bottle at him, whilst the protection suggests Depp injured himself.

Vasquez centered at the collection of occasions, which she recommended had been fantastic — claiming Depp may no longer do such a lot harm with a severed finger. Heard maintained that she didn’t recall the order by which issues came about, announcing, “I’ve by no means claimed that I will be able to consider the precise collection of these items. It is a multiday attack that came about over 3 terrible days.”

Vasquez additional sought to discredit Heard’s testimony concerning the incident in Australia via declaring “there isn’t a unmarried clinical document” of Heard’s accidents, nor are there any images of them.

Vasquez famous that Heard expressed fear for Depp’s substance abuse however persisted the use of medication and alcohol herself. She wondered whether or not it was once Heard who was once jealous, slightly than Depp — because the defendant has claimed. She recommended Depp were given Heard her position within the film “Aquaman,” and introduced a tape recording by which Heard insulted Depp’s profession, calling him “washed-up” and a “funny story.” She additionally introduced a couple of units of textual content messages by which Heard again and again asks Depp to reply to the telephone, as an try to painting Heard as jealous. “You had been texting him continuously,” Vasquez mentioned. Heard mentioned she despatched them in a determined try to get Depp to forestall the use of medication.

Vasquez pressed closely towards Heard’s argument that the op-ed she wrote — which lies on the center of the trial — isn’t about Depp however about what took place to her after she received a short lived restraining order towards the actor. “I used to be speaking a few larger factor, if truth be told, than simply Johnny,” Heard mentioned.

Heard’s countersuit revolves round a number of claims made within the press via Depp’s former legal professional Adam Waldman, who known as Heard’s accusations a hoax. She claims the accusations, which she characterised as a “unfavourable smear marketing campaign,” ended in the lack of profession alternatives.

In reaction, Vasquez learn headlines from articles negatively characterizing Heard that had been revealed sooner than Waldman’s feedback.

The cross-examination lasted till about 2:40 p.m., at which level Heard’s lawyer, Elaine Bredehoft, started redirect wondering, by which she challenged a couple of of Vasquez’s issues — reminiscent of how Heard were given her position in “Aquaman.”

“I labored in point of fact onerous,” Heard mentioned.

The redirect lasted about 35 mins, and Vasquez persistently — and effectively — objected to questions from Bredehoft — ceaselessly such a lot of instances in a row that it drew laughter from the court target market, which during the trial has been composed of most commonly Depp lovers.

The court docket then performed the video deposition of artist iO Tillett Wright, a pal of Heard’s who grew with reference to Depp for a couple of years. He described the actor as “beautiful,” “magical” and “very humorous” when he was once sober, however “paranoid,” “imply” and “surly” when drunk.

Even though he by no means witnessed Depp bodily attack Heard, Wright mentioned, he heard Depp say issues round her, reminiscent of “all she’s were given is her appears to be like.” He mentioned when Depp was once drunk, he would additionally “insult his lovers” and get in touch with them “remoras,” sometimes called suckerfish. He additionally recalled Depp telling him that “he simply in point of fact didn’t like lifestyles sober” and that he would “enjoy nice bouts of jealousy in relationships.”

Simply after Depp and Heard’s marriage rite, Wright mentioned, he congratulated Depp on their nuptials. Depp allegedly spoke back, “We’re married. Now I will be able to punch her within the face and no one can do anything else about it.”

He additionally relayed an incident by which he was once at the telephone with Heard, who instructed him that Depp was once satisfied they defecated on his pillow. Wright and Heard started guffawing, he mentioned, and Depp grew agitated. Wright heard a smack, “and the telephone dropped. And he mentioned to her, ‘You assume I hit you? You assume I f—ing hit you? What if I peel your f—ing hair again?’ After which I heard the telephone drop once more, and I heard her scream.”

The trial is scheduled to proceed Wednesday with testimony from further witnesses.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.